From owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Thu Dec 28 00:57:39 2000
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) id AAA88082;
	Thu, 28 Dec 2000 00:57:39 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (IDENT:root@ns.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18])
	by castle.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA88077
	for <FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 00:57:34 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.109])
	by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id eBRFvHZ23328;
	Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:57:22 +0200
Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1])
	by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eBRFvLD58968;
	Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:57:21 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <3A4A115F.1F5AF617@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:57:19 +0200
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: Vega International Capital
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Motomichi Matsuzaki <mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp>
CC: current@FreeBSD.org, bp@FreeBSD.org, audit@FreeBSD.org,
        FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
References: <3A49BF05.9098A5D8@FreeBSD.org>
		<86wvcmm4kc.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp>
		<3A49E668.FF0E701D@FreeBSD.org>
		<86u27qm24b.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp>
		<3A49F0F2.69123A25@FreeBSD.org> <86r92um060.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+000315
X-Sequence: FreeBSD-tech-jp 2997
Subject: [FreeBSD-tech-jp 2997] Re: Unicode support in cd9660 [patch for review]
Errors-To: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
X-Originator: sobomax@FreeBSD.org

Motomichi Matsuzaki wrote:

> At Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:38:58 +0200,
> Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > > But your solution is no effective and much harmful to multibyte users.
> > You are not quite right. For multibyte users my solution (workaround?) is at least equial to the previous no-unicode case . I do
> > not see how it can be harmful.
>
> 1. In just your workaround, multibyte users will take no merits.
>
> 2. Based on your direction, the size of loadable conversion table
>    will immensely expand for multibyte support, or be abandoned.
>    Fundamental misdesign will lead to such unfortunate situation.
>    So I said your solution was harmful.

Proposed by me patches is no way an official direction of the Project and as I advertised are merely a workaround to allow non-English
users to read CD with native filenames until comprehensive iconv for kernel will be introduced. I would be glad if someone will
replace my hack with more generic solution.

-Maxim

